June 29, 2003
New TLDs: Can you say .never?

ICANN continues at its snail's pace on introduction of new top-level domains. At the Montreal meeting, staff sprung this RFP for new sponsored TLDs. As if "a few" and "sponsored" weren't limitation enough, it further narrowed the applicant pool to those who had applied unsuccessfully as sponsored TLDs in November 2000.

It's unclear how recycling failed applications (with a new $25,000 fee) and excluding new ones can help ICANN in its "Proof of Concept" evaluation, but it is clear who's left out of the next round -- anyone who isn't .travel, .health, .union, .post, or .mobi (thanks Lawrence).

ICM Registry bannerThe slighted include ICM Registry, whose application for .XXX was unsponsored in 2000 (this is one of their banners hanging in the conference lobby). Betcha didn't know you could count on .XXX for "responsible growth of the DNS."

More commentary:
ALAC list
No such weblog
ICANNwatch

Posted by Wendy at June 29, 2003 02:24 PM | TrackBack
Comments
Track-Backs
Widespread optimism with regard to new gTLDs.
Excerpt: John Berryhill articulates optimism with respect to the appearance of an evaluation of the introduction of new gTLDs. He joins the cheerful Wendy Seltzer and (of course) the GNSO's CBUC which, while probably interested in learning from new development...
Weblog: No Such Weblog
Tracked: August 27, 2003 12:37 PM
Widespread optimism with regard to new gTLDs.
Excerpt: John Berryhill articulates optimism with respect to the appearance of an evaluation of the introduction of new gTLDs. He joins the cheerful Wendy Seltzer and (of course) the GNSO's CBUC which, while probably interested in learning from new development...
Weblog: No Such Weblog
Tracked: August 27, 2003 12:37 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?