<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stopping SOPA&#8217;s Anti-Circumvention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2011/12/15/stopping-sopas-anti-circumvention.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2011/12/15/stopping-sopas-anti-circumvention.html</link>
	<description>Musings of a techie lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 19:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wendy&#8217;s Blog: Legal Tags &#187; Keep Copyright Balance: Stop SOPA and PIPA</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2011/12/15/stopping-sopas-anti-circumvention.html#comment-7104</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy&#8217;s Blog: Legal Tags &#187; Keep Copyright Balance: Stop SOPA and PIPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/?p=777#comment-7104</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;circumvention&#8221; of court-ordered blocking that was written broadly enough that it could apply to Tor &#8212; which helps its users to &#8220;circumvent&#8221; local-network censorship. Further, both [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;circumvention&#8221; of court-ordered blocking that was written broadly enough that it could apply to Tor &#8212; which helps its users to &#8220;circumvent&#8221; local-network censorship. Further, both [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2011/12/15/stopping-sopas-anti-circumvention.html#comment-6050</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/?p=777#comment-6050</guid>
		<description>+1 for Mr. Wright above.  In fact some enterprising folks at the huge discussion site reddit.com have assembled a rudimentary hosts file http://bit.ly/rKoyH5.

The discussion rightly turned to issues of security, and the dangers of letting unknown third parties determine IP addresses on your computer in your hosts file.  The opportunity for abuse is enormous, and imho points pretty much to the Vixie et al letter referenced above.

Alternatively, the possibility for good behavior exists as well, some kind of "Open Source"/transparent community effort to create and vet such lists similar to the AdBlock list subscriptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 for Mr. Wright above.  In fact some enterprising folks at the huge discussion site reddit.com have assembled a rudimentary hosts file <a href="http://bit.ly/rKoyH5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/rKoyH5</a>.</p>
<p>The discussion rightly turned to issues of security, and the dangers of letting unknown third parties determine IP addresses on your computer in your hosts file.  The opportunity for abuse is enormous, and imho points pretty much to the Vixie et al letter referenced above.</p>
<p>Alternatively, the possibility for good behavior exists as well, some kind of &#8220;Open Source&#8221;/transparent community effort to create and vet such lists similar to the AdBlock list subscriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Wright</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2011/12/15/stopping-sopas-anti-circumvention.html#comment-6043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/?p=777#comment-6043</guid>
		<description>One of the things I find interesting is that, although Firefox/MAFIAAfire provides a convent workaround to DNS blocks, every operating system (Windows, Mac OSX, Linux &#38; Unix all alike) has a built-in bypass: The /etc/hosts file (or c:/Windows/System32/drivers/etc/hosts for modern Windows systems) allows you to manually put in an IP address against a hostname.

With this set, any time a program next connects to that URL it will goto that new address, bypassing any DNS override put in place by your ISP! It's hard not to see that with this being included as standard within pretty much every operating system on every computer connected to the internet, does this not in fact make every OS and PC illegal with the stroke of a single pen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I find interesting is that, although Firefox/MAFIAAfire provides a convent workaround to DNS blocks, every operating system (Windows, Mac OSX, Linux &amp; Unix all alike) has a built-in bypass: The /etc/hosts file (or c:/Windows/System32/drivers/etc/hosts for modern Windows systems) allows you to manually put in an IP address against a hostname.</p>
<p>With this set, any time a program next connects to that URL it will goto that new address, bypassing any DNS override put in place by your ISP! It&#8217;s hard not to see that with this being included as standard within pretty much every operating system on every computer connected to the internet, does this not in fact make every OS and PC illegal with the stroke of a single pen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

