<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Paper: Anticircumvention Versus Open Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2009/11/29/new-paper-anticircumvention-versus-open-innovation.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2009/11/29/new-paper-anticircumvention-versus-open-innovation.html</link>
	<description>Musings of a techie lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 19:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: seaan</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2009/11/29/new-paper-anticircumvention-versus-open-innovation.html#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>seaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/?p=629#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>For an earlier case study, try looking at audio recording. The 1992 AHRA has strict provisions when creating a high quality audio recorder. Think back to the original iPod and the hobbled Apple microphone (they reduced the sound quality so it would not come under AHRA regulations).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an earlier case study, try looking at audio recording. The 1992 AHRA has strict provisions when creating a high quality audio recorder. Think back to the original iPod and the hobbled Apple microphone (they reduced the sound quality so it would not come under AHRA regulations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

