Comments on: ICANN: Keep the Core Neutral, Stupid http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/06/25/icann_keep_the_core_neutral_stupid.html Musings of a techie lawyer Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:57:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding By: Angel Luke http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/06/25/icann_keep_the_core_neutral_stupid.html#comment-724 Angel Luke Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:14:25 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=427#comment-724 I could not agree more. I could not agree more.

]]> By: John Joseph Bachir http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/06/25/icann_keep_the_core_neutral_stupid.html#comment-723 John Joseph Bachir Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:44:42 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=427#comment-723 I could not agree more. I find myself strangely alone amongst my geek and web friends in my view that TLDs should be almost completely arbitrarily definable within a very loose structure. I could not agree more. I find myself strangely alone amongst my geek and web friends in my view that TLDs should be almost completely arbitrarily definable within a very loose structure.

]]> By: James Seng http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/06/25/icann_keep_the_core_neutral_stupid.html#comment-722 James Seng Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:42:39 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=427#comment-722 *sigh* we going down this path when they rejected .XXX Yes, the concept morality has no place in DNS. It opens up the question "whose morality" that is totally redherring to what ICANN suppose to be focus on. *sigh* we going down this path when they rejected .XXX

Yes, the concept morality has no place in DNS. It opens up the question “whose morality” that is totally redherring to what ICANN suppose to be focus on.

]]>