Comments on: NFL Clip Down Again http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html Musings of a techie lawyer Sun, 20 May 2012 19:25:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding By: Tiff-Diff http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-700 Tiff-Diff Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:39:22 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-700 oops... previous link was not correct <a href="http://tiffani-amber-thiessen.weblogs.pl" rel="nofollow">http://tiffani-amber-thiessen.weblogs.pl</a> oops…
previous link was not correct
http://tiffani-amber-thiessen.weblogs.pl

]]> By: Tiff-Diff http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-699 Tiff-Diff Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:37:08 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-699 YouTube will newer replace cinema :-D <a href="http://tiffani-thiessen.weblogs.pl" rel="nofollow">http://tiffani-thiessen.weblogs.pl</a> YouTube will newer replace cinema :-D
http://tiffani-thiessen.weblogs.pl

]]> By: crack http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-698 crack Sun, 25 Mar 2007 06:16:43 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-698 I think youtube will kill fair use. Its a broadcaster trying to piggy back on the rights of users. The NFL no doubt sees youtube as the infringer. Youtube passing along another person's claims doesn't alleviate them of possible violation. This will head to court. I think youtube will kill fair use. Its a broadcaster trying to piggy back on the rights of users. The NFL no doubt sees youtube as the infringer. Youtube passing along another person’s claims doesn’t alleviate them of possible violation. This will head to court.

]]> By: Kempton http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-697 Kempton Fri, 23 Mar 2007 06:28:03 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-697 Sounding like some other posters, I think students in your class will learn a lot more about law by see it in action. Good for you. Good for your students. And good for us too. Thanks for sharing your insights with us. Sounding like some other posters, I think students in your class will learn a lot more about law by see it in action. Good for you. Good for your students. And good for us too.

Thanks for sharing your insights with us.

]]> By: bc http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-696 bc Fri, 23 Mar 2007 03:23:57 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-696 Way to go, Professor Seltzer! Your CR class is proud. Way to go, Professor Seltzer! Your CR class is proud.

]]> By: Anonymous http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-695 Anonymous Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:02:28 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-695 What about your counter-claim actually makes the matrial 'clearly' not infringing? It doesn't seem like a misrepresentation for the NFL to disagree with your notice and to send a second takedown notice. On the other hand, it does seem like Youtube incorrectly followed the procedure necessary to keep them liability free. 512(g)(2)(C) seems to suggest they screwed that up when they obeyed the second takedown after your counter-notice. Your posts on this issue have been very interesting overall, and i'm curious what results. Do you plan on informing youtube of their mistake and having the clip republished? I like the idea that service providers can reach a point where they have to defend their users claims and refuse to heed repeated takedown notices. What about your counter-claim actually makes the matrial ‘clearly’ not infringing? It doesn’t seem like a misrepresentation for the NFL to disagree with your notice and to send a second takedown notice. On the other hand, it does seem like Youtube incorrectly followed the procedure necessary to keep them liability free. 512(g)(2)(C) seems to suggest they screwed that up when they obeyed the second takedown after your counter-notice.

Your posts on this issue have been very interesting overall, and i’m curious what results. Do you plan on informing youtube of their mistake and having the clip republished? I like the idea that service providers can reach a point where they have to defend their users claims and refuse to heed repeated takedown notices.

]]> By: ibz http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-694 ibz Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:59:36 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-694 hahah...i love this lone ranger against the big bad wolf thing! riaa sux !! dmca sux!! goooo freedom! hahah…i love this lone ranger against the big bad wolf thing! riaa sux !! dmca sux!! goooo freedom!

]]> By: anonymous http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-693 anonymous Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:59:05 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-693 D.M.C.A. Don't Make Copies Anymore (good luck ;) D.M.C.A.

Don’t

Make

Copies

Anymore

(good luck ;)

]]> By: Sas http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-692 Sas Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:33:47 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-692 very good... very good…

]]> By: DLPierz http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/03/18/nfl_clip_down_again.html#comment-691 DLPierz Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:57:09 +0000 http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=396#comment-691 Saw this on Fark. Way to go. ROck On, Wendy. Saw this on Fark. Way to go.

ROck On, Wendy.

]]>