<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Spectrum of Anti-Badware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2006/01/30/the_spectrum_of_anti_badware.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2006/01/30/the_spectrum_of_anti_badware.html</link>
	<description>Musings of a techie lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spamroll</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2006/01/30/the_spectrum_of_anti_badware.html#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Spamroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=322#comment-431</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wendy Selzer responds, lawyerly&lt;/strong&gt;

I guess that anti-spyware zealots have been redeemed, sort-of, after being &#34;kinda&#34; put down by a &#34;representative&#34; of the StopBadware.org &#34;coalition.&#34; Ms. Selzer has responded with all the &#34;kindness&#34; and &#34;can...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wendy Selzer responds, lawyerly</strong></p>
<p>I guess that anti-spyware zealots have been redeemed, sort-of, after being &quot;kinda&quot; put down by a &quot;representative&quot; of the StopBadware.org &quot;coalition.&quot; Ms. Selzer has responded with all the &quot;kindness&quot; and &quot;can&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spamroll</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2006/01/30/the_spectrum_of_anti_badware.html#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Spamroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=322#comment-430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wendy Selzer responds, lawyerly&lt;/strong&gt;

I guess that anti-spyware zealots have been redeemed, sort-of, after being "kinda" put down by a "representative" of the StopBadware.org "coalition." Ms. Selzer has responded with all the "kindness" and "candor" befitting the web....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wendy Selzer responds, lawyerly</strong></p>
<p>I guess that anti-spyware zealots have been redeemed, sort-of, after being &#8220;kinda&#8221; put down by a &#8220;representative&#8221; of the StopBadware.org &#8220;coalition.&#8221; Ms. Selzer has responded with all the &#8220;kindness&#8221; and &#8220;candor&#8221; befitting the web&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Eckelberry</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2006/01/30/the_spectrum_of_anti_badware.html#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Eckelberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=322#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Thanks, appreciate the clarification.  Btw -- trackbacks still appear broken.

I've blogged your response.

www.sunbeltblog.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, appreciate the clarification.  Btw &#8212; trackbacks still appear broken.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve blogged your response.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sunbeltblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sunbeltblog.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
