<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RentMyDVR.  Buy my lawsuit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/09/29/rentmydvr_buy_my_lawsuit.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/09/29/rentmydvr_buy_my_lawsuit.html</link>
	<description>Musings of a techie lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Crane</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/09/29/rentmydvr_buy_my_lawsuit.html#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Crane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=282#comment-399</guid>
		<description>If you have access to a certain TV Show you should be able to choose what technique you want to use to record that show.

I can't see why this technique should be more illegal that any other, i.e VHS, DVR, Tivo....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have access to a certain TV Show you should be able to choose what technique you want to use to record that show.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see why this technique should be more illegal that any other, i.e VHS, DVR, Tivo&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuzzy</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/09/29/rentmydvr_buy_my_lawsuit.html#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 17:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=282#comment-398</guid>
		<description>As a spin on the proposition, what if a different DVR was used for each "copy" requested by a different customer?  Thus there are no "multiple copies".  There is one copy for each individual customer.  Does that change the legal question? Further posit that the local copy is destroyed when provided to the remote individual customer.  Basically, a true "space and time shifting" operation.  Does that change the legal question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a spin on the proposition, what if a different DVR was used for each &#8220;copy&#8221; requested by a different customer?  Thus there are no &#8220;multiple copies&#8221;.  There is one copy for each individual customer.  Does that change the legal question? Further posit that the local copy is destroyed when provided to the remote individual customer.  Basically, a true &#8220;space and time shifting&#8221; operation.  Does that change the legal question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
