<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon Needs Betamax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html</link>
	<description>Musings of a techie lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6-beta2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Anybody can claim anything.  Aside from restrictions imposed as a condition of admittance to a venue or performance, it would seem that simply recording by film/digital image, whatever, taken in public, where there is no expectation of privacy, then the rights to such images would reside with the photographer.

I suppose CANON could explain what they mean by their notice and under what circumstances they think it might apply.  I doubt any type of "shrink wrap" or other unilateral assertion could overturn or transfer the photographer's rights.  At least in most jurisdictions in the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody can claim anything.  Aside from restrictions imposed as a condition of admittance to a venue or performance, it would seem that simply recording by film/digital image, whatever, taken in public, where there is no expectation of privacy, then the rights to such images would reside with the photographer.</p>
<p>I suppose CANON could explain what they mean by their notice and under what circumstances they think it might apply.  I doubt any type of &#8220;shrink wrap&#8221; or other unilateral assertion could overturn or transfer the photographer&#8217;s rights.  At least in most jurisdictions in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copyfight</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Copyfight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 16:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-336</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Photofinish for Copyright's Unintended Consequences&lt;/strong&gt;

A friend of mine has a new baby and, with family spread across the globe, likes to use online photo-printing services to share snapshots of the growing baby. She can create an online album, load up photos from the digital...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Photofinish for Copyright&#8217;s Unintended Consequences</strong></p>
<p>A friend of mine has a new baby and, with family spread across the globe, likes to use online photo-printing services to share snapshots of the growing baby. She can create an online album, load up photos from the digital&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Koslosky</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Koslosky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 08:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-332</guid>
		<description>I think Starbucks uses this angle to enforce their ban on photography in their shops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Starbucks uses this angle to enforce their ban on photography in their shops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wireless Doc</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Wireless Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 08:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-335</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Canon's copyright warning&lt;/strong&gt;

Techie lawyer Wendy Seltzer snaps a picture of the manual of her new Canon digital camera which gives a warning that her camera is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Canon&#8217;s copyright warning</strong></p>
<p>Techie lawyer Wendy Seltzer snaps a picture of the manual of her new Canon digital camera which gives a warning that her camera is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pritam Shetty</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Pritam Shetty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 03:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-331</guid>
		<description>Next they'll be telling you what pictures to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next they&#8217;ll be telling you what pictures to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joho the Blog</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Joho the Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-334</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Infringing technologies&lt;/strong&gt;

Wendy notices that her new Canon camera comes with a warning that it's not intended to be used to infringe on anyone's copyright. Next to get stamped with that stupid warning: Pencils, paper, brains and the air used by speech. [Technorati tags: canon c...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Infringing technologies</strong></p>
<p>Wendy notices that her new Canon camera comes with a warning that it&#8217;s not intended to be used to infringe on anyone&#8217;s copyright. Next to get stamped with that stupid warning: Pencils, paper, brains and the air used by speech. [Technorati tags: canon c&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 15:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-330</guid>
		<description>I was thinking a EULA for the camera *itself* ("This camera is licensed, not sold. By using this camera, you agree to the following: ..."). Maybe EULA'ing the embedded software is practically the same thing
(sure, you can take pictures, but not download them anywhere).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking a EULA for the camera *itself* (&#8221;This camera is licensed, not sold. By using this camera, you agree to the following: &#8230;&#8221;). Maybe EULA&#8217;ing the embedded software is practically the same thing<br />
(sure, you can take pictures, but not download them anywhere).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 15:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-329</guid>
		<description>I haven't clicked through any "agreements" yet....  but I'm sure if I install any of the computer software, there will be EULAs aplenty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t clicked through any &#8220;agreements&#8221; yet&#8230;.  but I&#8217;m sure if I install any of the computer software, there will be EULAs aplenty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2005/05/26/canon_needs_betamax.html#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 13:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=250#comment-328</guid>
		<description>But does it have a EULA too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But does it have a EULA too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
