<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Losing SiteFinder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/10/04/losing_sitefinder.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/10/04/losing_sitefinder.html</link>
	<description>Musings of a techie lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/10/04/losing_sitefinder.html#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=62#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Way to go! This is really being missed by most people... who tend to list all the apps that have been broken instead of what's fundamentally wrong with VeriSign unilaterally instating a new commercial service that affects the blood vessels of 90% of the Internet and a large part of our information infrastructure. I really hope this affects the contractual language between ICANN and the registrars in general... maybe a "DON'T BREAK THE INTERNET, STUPID!" clause?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go! This is really being missed by most people&#8230; who tend to list all the apps that have been broken instead of what&#8217;s fundamentally wrong with VeriSign unilaterally instating a new commercial service that affects the blood vessels of 90% of the Internet and a large part of our information infrastructure. I really hope this affects the contractual language between ICANN and the registrars in general&#8230; maybe a &#8220;DON&#8217;T BREAK THE INTERNET, STUPID!&#8221; clause?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TriNetre - The Third Eye</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/10/04/losing_sitefinder.html#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>TriNetre - The Third Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=62#comment-50</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fundamental issue with SiteFinder&lt;/strong&gt;

A couple of my friends have been asking me why VeriSign's SiteFinder is creating such a storm, when all it offers is a "service similar to what MSN provides". I
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fundamental issue with SiteFinder</strong></p>
<p>A couple of my friends have been asking me why VeriSign&#8217;s SiteFinder is creating such a storm, when all it offers is a &#8220;service similar to what MSN provides&#8221;. I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/10/04/losing_sitefinder.html#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=62#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Way to go! This is really being missed by most people... who tend to list all the apps that have been broken instead of what's fundamentally wrong with VeriSign unilaterally instating a new commercial service that affects the blood vessels of 90% of the Internet and a large part of our information infrastructure. I really hope this affects the contractual language between ICANN and the registrars in general... maybe a "DON'T BREAK THE INTERNET, STUPID!" clause?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go! This is really being missed by most people&#8230; who tend to list all the apps that have been broken instead of what&#8217;s fundamentally wrong with VeriSign unilaterally instating a new commercial service that affects the blood vessels of 90% of the Internet and a large part of our information infrastructure. I really hope this affects the contractual language between ICANN and the registrars in general&#8230; maybe a &#8220;DON&#8217;T BREAK THE INTERNET, STUPID!&#8221; clause?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
