<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You can access your car again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/09/05/you_can_access_your_car_again.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/09/05/you_can_access_your_car_again.html</link>
	<description>Musings of a techie lawyer</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wendy</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/09/05/you_can_access_your_car_again.html#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2003 21:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=60#comment-44</guid>
		<description>True the ruling was only denying the plaintiff summary judgment, but the opinion suggested that if the defendant were to file its own summary judgment dismissing the DMCA 1201 claims, the judge would be inclined to grant it.   
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True the ruling was only denying the plaintiff summary judgment, but the opinion suggested that if the defendant were to file its own summary judgment dismissing the DMCA 1201 claims, the judge would be inclined to grant it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuzzy</title>
		<link>http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2003/09/05/you_can_access_your_car_again.html#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuzzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2003 17:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wendy.seltzer.org/wordpress/?p=60#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the ruling was only against granting a summary judgement to the plaintiff on the DMCA claim. The case will still go to trial, and could still be decided against the defendants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the ruling was only against granting a summary judgement to the plaintiff on the DMCA claim. The case will still go to trial, and could still be decided against the defendants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
